The Supernatural vs. the Neuropsychological: Macbeth’s Fatal Entanglement in Future Memory
PDF

Keywords

Future Memory
Blueprints
Beguiling the Time
Consolidation
Recharging Memory

How to Cite

Al-Abdullah , M. ., Banat, S. ., Mansour, A. W. ., Shdouh, A. ., Al-Rashid, A. ., & Alhawamdeh, H. A. . (2024). The Supernatural vs. the Neuropsychological: Macbeth’s Fatal Entanglement in Future Memory. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(5), 1053–1062. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i5.3955

Abstract

Shakespeare portrays his protagonist in Macbeth as haunted by future memory. The blueprints of the future of Macbeth are provided by Supernatural aids.  These equivocal blueprints breed the protagonist's prospective memory. However, the equivocation embedded in them leads to his confusion and the confusion of the whole country. In Ingvar (1985), who coined the expression "future memory," in neuropsychology, the concept is guided by past experience and mental imagination. In contrast, prospective memory of the protagonist is dictated by the supra-terrestrial agency of the three witches who take us off-guard at the outset of the play, and surprise Macbeth and Banquo in Act 1, Scene 3 and later in Scene of Act IV. The study hopes to analyze Ingvar's concept of future memory in neuropsychology and Shakespeare's version of the concept. It also hopes to demonstrate that the vision of the Elizabethan bard was not informed by empirical studies of the brain, but by the cultural concepts of his Age that used to give credibility to magic, demonology, fairies, and supernatural intervention in terrestrial life and time.

https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i5.3955
PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.